A portrait of Mirza Waheed | White Star
Over time, Dr K becomes involved in the country’s penal system. He is chosen as a “punishment surgeon” and assists the authorities in disfiguring convicted offenders as per the law of the land. With each procedure that he performs, he is drawn deeper into a moral conundrum and is forced to question his role in the brutal acts of mutilation.
There are moments when he is astonished to find that those “abnormal” procedures seem somewhat commonplace to him. “…if a man gets used to murder, he can get used to anything,” is how he explains it. At other points in the story, he tries to justify his acts by insisting that his involvement in the surgical procedures guarantees that they are conducted in a humane fashion. As his bank balance swells every month, Dr K deludes himself into believing that he has his family’s best interest at heart.
Yet, after his wife’s death, he has to contend with a lifetime of guilt. The decisions he has to make subsequently put him in an uncomfortable position: between performing his duty and protecting his loved ones.
Dr K’s monologue meanders from one anecdote to another, leaving the readers to piece together the retired physician’s life through his seemingly disjointed musings. The narrator deliberately avoids closures, digressing at crucial points in the story, but discerning readers may find that the novel’s complex structure and skilful interludes serve to highlight the uncertainty in Dr K’s mind. The narrative struggles to follow a predictable arc just as the narrator struggles to find the most appropriate means of sharing the details of his past with his daughter. His efforts to come up with the right idiom to express his anxieties, regrets and frustrations are amply reflected in the way his story is written.
This writing technique makes the novel all the more realistic and poignant. The author could not have possibly created the same effect if he had followed a chronological and rational trajectory. Page after iridescent page, Waheed explores how people pay a steep price to achieve their ambitions. He smartly catches the subtle nuances of his protagonist’s unbearable guilt.
Tell Her Everything is also all about the moments that precede an actual event — in this case, a conversation between Dr K and Sara that never happens. At times during his monologue, Dr K anticipates and addresses his daughter’s responses as if a conversation is actually taking place between them. In his reveries, he, indeed, develops an easy camaraderie with his daughter, giving him the hope that she will understand his intentions once the two meet.
Sara’s point of view on her relationship with her father appears in the narrative through letters that she has written to Dr K while travelling on Amtrak — the American railway. Having lived away from her parents, she struggles to understand why she was uprooted from her home as a child but she is willing to hear what Dr K has to say. Her letters offer him hope that his desire for reconciliation with her will not be greeted with silence or indifference.
The introductory blurb for the novel states that it is about “the corrosive nature of complicity” but Tell Her Everything resists the urge to make moral judgments on Dr K’s role as a “punishment-surgeon”. By doing so, the novel also test its readers’ ability to empathise with the protagonist without having to rely on the blinkers of morality.
The writer is a journalist, novelist and editor.
The article was published in the Herald's May 2019 issue. To read more subscribe to the Herald in print.