Primary school students sitting on the floor in Ber Khalozo village in Bajaur tribal district | Ghulam Dastageer
Aman Ali and Sajjad were in their teens when they died earlier this year.
They were hired by one Haji Speen Khan to have his sister’s son, Sher Rahman, murdered. The uncle and the nephew had a dispute over some agricultural land in Sagi Bala village in what until recently was the Mohmand tribal agency.
On the morning of October 4, the two teenagers shot firearms at Rahman in Sagi Bala, killing him on the spot. His cousin, Abdur Rasheed, who was with him at the time, returned the fire which hit Aman, leaving him wounded and bleeding. Sajjad still managed to drive him away from the site of the murder on a motorcycle.
After travelling about a kilometre, they left the motorcycle and got into a taxi to reach a nearby private healthcare facility. Sajjad left Aman there so that he could get some treatment. He himself went to a checkpoint of the Frontier Corps (FC), a paramilitary force deployed in Mohmand to ward off terrorism. There, he confessed to his crime.
Aman and Sajjad both belonged to Ghazi Beg village, which is also in Mohmand, but the latter’s family had moved to nearby Charsadda district in Khyber Pakhtunkhwa some years ago.
Back in Sagi Bala, local men came out of their houses as soon as they heard about the murder and started looking en masse for the murderers. When they came to know that Aman was at the healthcare facility, they rushed there, forced him out of his sick bed, took him to an open space and stoned him to death.
Then they moved to the checkpoint to get Sajjad. Sensing the hostile mood of the crowd, the FC men told Sajjad to leave. He was shot dead by a villager as soon as he left the checkpoint.
The next day, the villagers raised a lashkar, a tribal militia, to punish Haji Speen Khan. They accused him of breaching a local agreement reached in 2003 against the use of hired assassins.
That year, someone from the village hired an assassin to have his rival killed but the villagers apprehended the assassin, killed him and set his body on fire. They then resolved that any resident of Sagi Bala who hired an assassin would have to face a fine, the burning down of his house and a permanent exile from the village.
The lashkar wanted to impose all these penalties against Haji Speen Khan but government officials posted in the area became involved before that could happen. The officials, instead, convened a jirga, a council of local tribal elders, to resolve the conflict. The jirga decided not to impose any fine on Haji Speen Khan and also to let him stay in the village, but his house was still to be burnt down. The jirga also handed over to the government 36 people who were among the crowd that had chased and killed the assassins.
The outcome of the jirga could have been more drastic if Mohmand was still a tribal agency, with its own system of retribution and collective punishment endorsed by the government under the Frontier Crimes Regulation (FCR). Imposed by the British in 1901, the regulation gave the residents of tribal agencies a high level of autonomy in organising their personal, religious, social and economic lives in exchange for accepting collective responsibility for the maintenance of public order.
Now, under the 25th Constitutional Amendment passed by the Parliament in May this year, the agency is in the process of being merged politically, administratively and judicially with Khyber Pakhtunkhwa. As are six other agencies and their adjacent Frontier Regions, all part of the defunct Federally Administered Tribal Areas (Fata) located in north and northwest Pakistan. The old customary system of justice is now under pressure to follow provincial and federal laws.
On May 25, 2018, the president of Pakistan issued an interim order, the Fata Interim Governance Regulation (FIGR) to replace the FCR. Six months later, a new administrative and judicial setup is yet to emerge in the tribal regions. It was this vacuum that showed itself glaringly in the jirga’s proceedings at Sagi Bala.
Since there is no police in the tribal regions to arrest those involved in a crime, a jirga representing all the tribes in a particular area is perhaps the only means available to the administration to ensure that crimes do not go unnoticed and unpunished. Also, while the government is yet to appoint judges in the former tribal agencies, their old judicial system presided over by officials of the civilian administration has all but become dysfunctional.
Under the FCR, trials were conducted by an assistant political agent who also headed the administration in a tribal sub-division. Challenges to his decisions were heard by the commissioner of the division closest to a tribal agency. A final appeal could be lodged before a three-member tribunal appointed by the government and comprising two senior bureaucrats and a lawyer eligible to be a high court judge and conversant in tribal traditions and customs collectively called rivaj.
The transitional system now in place initially kept the first two judicial forums intact: an assistant commissioner would hear cases and a commissioner was authorised to take up appeals against his verdicts. The appellate tribunal, however, was replaced by the Peshawar High Court.
On November 12, the Peshawar High Court upended this arrangement. A two-judge bench of the court ruled that the judicial authority being exercised by executive officers in tribal regions was unconstitutional and against the principle of separation of powers. Executive officials posted in the former Fata are no longer authorised to conduct a trial and punish the perpetrators of a crime.
Dispute resolution is now entirely dependent upon jirgas — and will remain so until a new system of justice is set up in the tribal lands.
A case in Tirah valley, a remote mountainous region in Khyber tribal district, highlights how this is bad news for those falling on the wrong side of jirga justice.
A local girl and boy eloped from the valley in August. They travelled to Sadda, a town in the nearby Kurram tribal region and found refuge there in a hotel. The girl’s relatives traced them there and tried to take them back to Tirah by force. The resulting skirmish attracted the attention of the district administration in Kurram which briefly detained the men harassing the girl and the boy.
A month later, an eight-member jirga got together in Tirah valley. It had equal representation from the Bar Qambar Khel and Malik Din Khel tribes, respectively representing the girl and the boy. The jirga unanimously decided that the girl’s tribe had the right to kill both of them wherever and whenever they were found.
Even when the decision violates the law of the land, local authorities have no administrative and judicial tools to stop the tribespeople from implementing it. The tribespeople, on the other hand, consider it their right to do so under their traditional code of honour.
As a tribal elder, a malak, in Mohmand puts it: “We cannot spare a girl who brings a bad name to her family and tribe by eloping with somebody.”