Erum Bashir performing The Think by Bankleer, a Berlin-based artist duo, at the Karachi Biennale 2017 | Courtesy Karachi Biennale Trust
“This is not the first time we have presented performance art,” Sameera Raja, who runs Canvas Gallery, told me recently. “We exhibited Amin Gulgee’s [Abacus in 2005] and we have included performance in off-site shows [at places such as] Mohatta Palace and Frere Hall,” she said.
According to her, people have strong reactions to performance art — both for and against. “Mostly they react against it because they don’t understand it but it has never met with indifference which is a good thing.”
Amin Gulgee echoes her views. There seems to be interest and excitement about performance art among the art audience in Karachi, he said to me in a recent conversation.
Both Sameera and Amin Gulgee concur that the aim of staging exhibitions of performance art is not necessarily to elicit a positive response. Their point is to generate some kind of reaction. “We keep on doing [it to make] people aware of performance art, to make it more mainstream,” said the former.
There is certainly a need for this kind of awareness. Pakistani audiences are still confused over what differentiates performance art from the performing arts. “If you invite someone for a performance show, they think they are coming over for song and dance,” Sameera pointed out. If they see Sheema Kermani being a part of a performance art show, she explained, they walk away happy, thinking, ‘We got to see her perform for free’. “With other works, for the most part, they walk away feeling disgruntled.”
For Zarmeene Shah, who heads the liberal arts programme at the IVS, such audience reaction is not entirely unexpected. “Performance has not evolved here as it did in the West. You cannot discount street theatre and dance and our own narrative traditions when considering performance art in our context.” The presence of these traditions, she argued, is the reason why we see performance art as somewhere in between the performing arts and storytelling.
Shah also pointed out that performance artists in Pakistan do not have the support mechanisms that their counterparts in the West have. We don’t have the Guggenheim, we don’t have MoMA [The Museum of Modern Art].”
And it is not just the wider Pakistani audience that is finding it difficult to grapple with performance art. Critics are also struggling to come to terms with it.
Nilofur Farrukh, chief executive of the Karachi Biennale, underscored the problems faced by Pakistani art critics when she stated recently: “Generally speaking, they are not engaging with [performance art] in any big way.” The same was true when artists started using video as an artistic medium, she said. “Critics were not seriously looking at it.”
The critics’ views, according to her, depend upon the amount of their exposure to performance art. “If they have seen a lot of performance art, they will have a deeper insight into it.”
So even while it is gaining ground, performance art is still an emerging field in Pakistan. It is engaging an increasing number of artists but, for most of them, it is an extension of their other formal practices. They see it as a way to say things they cannot in other mediums.
“Performance art’s advantage is that it is ephemeral.
You can tackle challenging issues through it,” is how Amin Gulgee put it.
The writer is a freelance writer based in Karachi.
This article was published in the Herald's November 2018 issue. To read more subscribe to the Herald in print.