Boulders perched on top of the hill
Those loans were not her first concern after she got out of the debris. Her entire family was trapped underneath and some of them were crying for help, says Ghulam Sarwar, a local welfare activist who reached the site of the accident only half an hour later.
Nageena first tried to remove the debris herself but the neighbours did not let her do that, says Sarwar. They shifted her to a house nearby. “She showed great patience throughout the rescue operation. No one saw her mourning or crying,” he adds.
The accident occurred at 4:15 am. By 8:30 am, Sarwar and five other locals had pulled out the whole family from the debris, using a spade and an iron bar. But they could rescue only three of Nageena’s children — all small girls. Her husband, 45, daughters – 18-year-old Kainat and 16-year-old Iqra – her son Abdullah, 11, and her seven-year-old nephew Atif had all died.
Ambulances were ready as soon as the injured were retrieved. They were immediately taken to the Civil Hospital. One of them, Nageena’s five-year-old daughter Yusra, is still undergoing treatment for a broken leg at a private clinic in North Nazimabad.
The boulder, about 25 feet in diameter, could have caused more damage if it had continued rolling onto other houses located in the same armpits of the hill where Nageena’s house was. Also, if it had crashed down a few hours later, it could have threatened the lives of more than 50 children who came to study the Quran from her during the day.
Nageena is now staying with her brother-in-law Muhammad Nisar who also lives in Gulshan-e-Ghazi, which has become a sprawling settlement of more than 25,000 people. Nisar’s son Atif, who also died in the accident, was visiting his aunt and cousins that night. “If I had forced him to come back home he would have been still alive but I believe everyone has to die when their time comes,” he says.
This sense of resignation has taken time to set in. “I fell unconscious when I found my son and others trapped under the huge boulder and its splinters,” Nisar says in an interview, more than two weeks after the accident. Some in the neighbourhood disclose that Nageena and her husband were aware of the threat that the boulder posed and they wanted to have it removed. But they did not have the 10,000 rupees required for the task.
There have been similar accidents in the past too.
Some 16 years earlier, a boulder rolled onto the house of one Abdul Hakeem, located in the same part of Gulshan-e-Ghazi. A large number of people were gathered at his house that day to mark the 40th day of his death. Four of them – his sister, mother-in-law and two sons – died on the spot.
About a decade ago, a rock rolled down a hill and killed two labourers, Zarak Khan and Gul Khan, in another part of Gulshan-e-Ghazi where they were loading sand onto a trolley. Several boulders are still lying in the area.
Officials at a KMC department that is responsible for looking after katchi abadis such as Gulshan-e-Ghazi say removing the boulders is not their duty because they are lying outside the legal boundaries of the settlement.
Najmuddin Sikandar, a former director of the land department at KMC, is not willing to let the officials off the hook so easily. They are responsible for failing to demarcate boundaries between the legal limits of katchi abadis and their nearby government lands, he says.
He also holds the KMC’s town planners – as well as those of the Karachi Development Authority – responsible for encroachment of hills. They have never bothered to offer affordable but planned housing facilities to the poor, he argues. It is due to the shortage of housing facilities that people are forced to purchase plots in dangerous areas, because it is the only land they can afford to buy, Sikandar says. “Nobody wants to live on those hills by choice.”
Nazeer Lakhani, director of KMC’s katchi abadis section, responds to the criticism by saying that his department does not have resources for demarcation. “We are not in a position to erect proper fencing on hills to avert rockslides,” he says. He also has a reason why his department does not turn the encroached land into planned real estate with no hazards: it will only provide incentive to land grabbers to encroach upon more hills, says Lakhani.
This article was originally published in the Herald's May 2017 issue with the headline "House under the hill". To read more subscribe to the Herald in print.
The writer is a staffer at the Herald.