Women wait outside the Nadra's National Swift Registration Centre in Sahiwal | White Star
Another Nadra assistant director, Shahid Yousaf, was arrested from Peshawar on August 21 this year for issuing CNICs to Afghan nationals. Around the same time, more than 200 Nadra employees were arrested in Karachi over similar charges.
S obia Bano, a resident of Abbottabad, found her CNIC blocked in May 2013. When she approached Nadra to find the reason for the blocking, she was told that she had obtained two different cards, registering herself twice with two different dates of birth. She was shocked. Bano moved the federal ombudsman and was able to prove that she had never applied for a second CNIC. During proceedings in front of the ombudsman, Nadra officials revealed that someone else had applied for, and obtained, the second card on her behalf. They, however, did not reveal who that applicant was and who was using the second card issued in her name.
The ombudsman was highly critical of Nadra's failure in the case. " ... Nadra's advanced biometric system of record checking should have detected this when the second CNIC was applied and later issued," he wrote in his verdict.
Former Nadra chief Tariq Malik says the authority's system is capable of more than just that. It can detect the applicant and find out who owns the second card, he says. "When a CNIC is issued, everything is recorded, including the name as well as the thumb impression of the person who makes the data entry," he tells Herald. A single click on a Nadra computer can find out the suspected data entry operator and, through him, the person who submits an application for a fake CNIC, he adds.
In Bano's case, it is clear that the second card was issued with the connivance of some Nadra officials. It is also obvious that someone somewhere is trying to protect those officials as well as the person who applied for the second card.
In many other cases, the cards get blocked due to careless mistakes by the applicants, says a field officer working at Nadra's registration office in Rawalpindi. Sometimes, two brothers report their dates of births to be less than nine months apart from each other, he says. Since this is not possible, we block the CNIC already issued to one of the two and ask them both to appear in person at a Nadra office with some documentary evidence of their respective dates of birth, he adds. "In the last six months, we have blocked hundreds of such CNICs in Rawalpindi and Islamabad alone."
Senior Nadra officials acknowledge that blocking CNICs – rightly or wrongly – is a problem that needs to be taken care of. They also claim the authority has an elaborate system of checks in place to detect and stop any wrong entries in the database. "We use data entry software which has almost 400 checks to make sure that entries are not duplicated and no cards are issued to wrong persons," says an official.
Yet, it is well known that numerous wrong entries are being made and thousands of cards are being issued on their basis. The authority's officials say they are aware of this, too, and are taking stringent administrative measures to address it. "In the last three months, we have sacked 29 of our officials involved in issuing CNICs on wrong entries or for committing other related irregularities," says a senior Nadra official.
This article was originally published in the Herald's December 2015 issue. To read more subscribe to the Herald in print.
The writer is a special correspondent for Dawn News and tweets @Umer_1967.