• DAWN.COM
  • DawnNews TV
  • ePaper
  • Herald
  • CityFM89
  • Events
  • Dawn Relief
  • Sunday 19th May 2013
Herald
  • Home
  • Columns & Blogs

Main menu

Skip to primary content
Skip to secondary content
  • Cover Story
  • Special Report
  • Editorial
  • Perspective
    • 360 °
    • Still Counting
    • Vantage Point
    • Opinion Survey
  • Features
  • Profiles & Interviews
  • Live Discussion
  • Reviews
  • Gallery
  • Regulars
    • One hour with
    • The funny side of

Post navigation

← Previous Next →

Blame thy neighbour

By Ghulam Dastageer | October 18, 2011
13
Tweet

Tightened security on one of the roads in the district of Chitral. Photo Courtesy Ghulam Dastageer

In the latest flaring up of tensions between Islamabad and Washington, Pakistan’s civil and military leaders are blaming the America-led foreign forces in Afghanistan for their failure to stop the cross-border incursions from Afghanistan into Pakistani territory. Government and intelligence sources in Peshawar go to the extent of claiming that the Afghan National Army and the North Atlantic Treaty Organisation (Nato) are actually supporting and sponsoring these attacks. Mian Iftikhar Hussain, the spokesman of the Khyber Pakhtunkhwa government, has, in fact, made public statements to the effect that both the Afghan National Army and Nato supported the attacks inside Pakistan. He says there is a popular perception in Pakistan that attacks are being orchestrated to force Pakistan into launching a military action in the North Waziristan tribal agency.

Many people in Chitral andUpper Dir, where these cross-border encounters have taken place, also believe that the incursions could not have taken place without the support of the forces on the other side of the border. Some local residents described that the militants involved in the assaults were wearing the Afghan National Army uniform. They also claim having witnessed unusual movement of the Nato’s planes while the attacks were launched.

“The attacks show that the militants had strong backing,” says Sardar Mohammad Khan, a former military officer who has also served two stints with the Chitral Scouts and is a resident of Chitral. Every insurgent, he explains, would have carried about 50-kilogrammes of arms and ammunition. “In a mountainous terrain it is very difficult to move with such a heavy load [without any logistical support],” he says. That it would have taken the attackers many days to amass the weapons at the border on the mountain peaks and then cross intoPakistansuggests that it is impossible that the forces inAfghanistanremained unaware of their activities all this while, he says. But Sardar Mohammad Khan also acknowledges thatAfghanistan’sNuristanprovince, where some of the attacks are being launched from, is under the complete control of the Afghan Taliban, with no influence of the Nato or the Afghan army there.

A well-placed intelligence source, however, points out that Nato has a massive presence inAfghanistan’s Kunar province which is adjacent toNuristanas well as Chitral and Dir in Pakistan and is a source of many encounters. “We have credible reports that the Tehrik-e-TalibanPakistancommander for Mohmand Agency, Abdul Wali (alias Umar Khalid), frequently visits Topchi Kandak [where Nato has one of its biggest bases in the region] and has even held meetings with the American officials inKabul,” says the intelligence source wishing to remain unnamed. He claims that Fazlullah Wahidi, the governor of Kunar, allowed the Swat Taliban to take shelter in his province after they were uprooted from Malakand division during the military operations of 2009 and 2010.

The source claims that Rozi Khan, the director of the Afghan Reconciliation Commission for Kunar province, has recently arranged a meeting of some Bajaur Taliban leaders including Jan Wali (alias Sheena), Faisal and Ali Rahman with American officials in Asadabad, the capital of Kunar. He wonders why the Americans so successfully target the al-Qaeda men in Pakistan’s tribal areas but fail to do anything against the militants operating in Afghanistan. “Why don’t they (Nato) deploy their troops on the border or allow us to fence the border [as Pakistan has been demanding for years]?” he asks.

Khyber Pakhtunkhwa government spokesman Hussain says the attacks demonstrate that either the Nato forces are incapable of curbing the militants or that they lack the will to do so. “In both cases, the situation proves to be very dangerous,” he says. He puts it to the deep-rooted “mistrust” among Pakistan, Afghanistan and the United States. “It is beyond comprehension that all the three countries have military presence on the border but still they cannot contain cross-border terrorism.” For him, all sides need to stop distinguishing between ‘good’ and ‘bad’ Taliban. “If the three sides continue protecting the Taliban they believe to be good, the Taliban in general will continue finding breathing space and attacking their targets both in Pakistan and Afghanistan,” he remarks.

Read more: 2011, army, Chitral, Dir, security.
13
Tweet
Want to read more? Subscribe to the print edition. Click here for details.

13 thoughts on “Blame thy neighbour”

  1. krishnan on October 24, 2011 at 11:06 am said:

    USA says that they have shared intelligence reports to substantiate the claim that the ISI is supporting the Haqqani attack in Kabul.That input will throw more light on the issue – as one does not know whom to believe.

    Reply ↓
    • Palvasha von Hassell on October 25, 2011 at 9:33 am said:

      I thought Clinton admitted recently to having no proof to substantiate that claim? Not that her saying so was needed, though!

      Reply ↓
  2. Hamza on October 24, 2011 at 12:57 pm said:

    It seems that the Taliban are going to win at the end of the day.

    Reply ↓
    • Cynical on October 24, 2011 at 3:31 pm said:

      I agree completely. In fact I have stopped shaving and hope to be ready by the time they arrive at my door.

      Reply ↓
  3. JNC on October 24, 2011 at 4:28 pm said:

    If militants can cross to Afghanistan on a daily basis for the past 10 years, then why all this anger if someone comes from in the other side for the past few months only. Its simply a case of ” what goes round comes round “. We are being killed by our own assets

    Reply ↓
    • Maria on October 26, 2011 at 9:39 am said:

      I think a parallel argument can be made for the other side as well. “they” are also being killed by their own “rescuers/mujahideen”, the kind their civil society as well as those in power bred and were/are proud of, not for past decade, but for years! Then y single out Pakistan in the blame? Maybe all three parties shall stop blaming and start hailing the killers!?
      Also, the attacks are not exactly “few months”, more like “few years” old.
      These days US, especially Ms Clinton’s statements, sound little more than Rehman Malik’s conspiracy theories which he seems to hatch on his own as well. The entire scenario is ridiculous to the extreme.

      Reply ↓
  4. Ikramuddin Akbar on October 24, 2011 at 9:24 pm said:

    Americans must have mercy on their troops. They unnecessarily interfered in Vietnam and fled in haste, Vietnam got united, they are in south Korea, may be there to unite North and south Korea one day. Now they are in Iraq and Afghanistan. Nowhere they gained any dignity, except in second world war where they had a purpose and Americans will be remembered forever. It is better for them to get out of the quicksand now.

    Reply ↓
  5. sam on October 24, 2011 at 11:54 pm said:

    It seems Nato has adopted the Pakistani age old stratergy of Do and Deny.

    Reply ↓
  6. Ahmed on October 25, 2011 at 6:32 am said:

    It is not from today, it has been happening for many years now along Chitral/Dir region. Circumstancial evidence indicates that TTP with their leader Fazlullah or Mullah FM is actually helping US, Nato, Indians and elements of Northern Alliance in Afghanistan. He has not attacked Nato once and keeps butchering (quite litereally) people on Pakistan side of border. So just looking at the situation from a distance, looking at numbers of casualties and looking at material damage, its clear that Pakistan has suffered more than anyone else and yet we are asked to do more. I say “fool for your loving no more”…..

    Reply ↓
    • Sadia on October 25, 2011 at 11:25 am said:

      well, then why did we let him get away from Swat? why didn’t we apprehend him then? It’s always so much easier to blame someone else.

      Reply ↓
  7. Cyrus Howell on October 25, 2011 at 11:04 pm said:

    ” In India, Pakistan is largely perceived as weak because it cannot—or will not—fight certain domestic militant groups that threaten the government or its neighbors. The primary threat to India is not from the Pakistani military or its nuclear arsenal, but rather from nonstate actors such as Lashkar-e-Taiba, the Pakistan-based terrorist organization that perpetrated several attacks on Indian civilian and military facilities, including the Mumbai attacks in November 2008 (known as 26/11) that killed 166 people. In short, most Indian officials would prefer a strong Pakistan that could reduce the domestic instability spilling over its borders.”
    COUNCIL ON FOREIGN RELATIONS

    Reply ↓
    • Palvasha von Hassell on October 26, 2011 at 8:28 am said:

      Do stop boring us to death by repeating the same old story time and again. No sane person really believes that Pakistan is behind India’s many insurgenies, which manifest themselves in terrorist attacks in its cities. The mantra of “Pakistan. or Pakistani elements are behind Indian and Afghan troubles” is one for fools.

      Reply ↓
  8. Qalim on October 26, 2011 at 6:43 am said:

    “we desire death more ardently than you desire life”….a freudian slip perhaps or is that mindset responsible for all the ills?!

    Reply ↓

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>

Advertisement

More from this section:

  • The king is back, long live the king
  • Journal observations
  • PMLN, PTI are neck and neck
  • Nuclear explosions and elections
  • Kenize Mourad

Events

Most commented
COVER STORY:
The daughter of the nation
BLOGS:
Journal observations
COLUMNS:
Men on a mission
SPECIAL REPORT:
Elections 2013: survey indicates close contest

Cover Story:

In expert langauge

In expert langauge

Our experts take a look a look at voting behaviour and make some predictions.

more
The great unknown

The great unknown

Mooed Yusuf and Ali Sultan analyse voters’ outlook and preferences on electoral issues and outcomes.

more
Subscribe to Herald
Copyright © 2011 DAWN.COM
  • ADVERTISE WITH US
  • DAWN MEDIA
  • PRIVACY POLICY
  • TERMS AND CONDITIONS